Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Results

Scientist III, TSS CGD NCAR

The control reaches a median monthly NSE of 0.106 across 2,257 gauges. Hillslope hydrology raises it to 0.219 and prognostic phenology lowers it to 0.067; irrigation and evolving land cover change it by less than 0.01.

Control baseline

Monthly NSE at each gauge, control

Monthly NSE at each gauge, control.

Monthly KGE at each gauge, control

Monthly KGE at each gauge, control.

abs(PBIAS) at each gauge, control

abs(PBIAS) at each gauge, control (dashboard; scale 0 to 100%). The map shows the size of the bias, not its sign.

Configuration sensitivities

Hillslope hydrology is the only option that improves streamflow skill substantially: median monthly NSE rises from 0.106 to 0.219 and KGE from 0.251 to 0.348. Prognostic phenology lowers skill on all three metrics, and irrigation and evolving land cover change it by amounts mostly within the materiality threshold.

Each contrast changes one option against the right baseline (spinup history also differs by configuration; see Lessons, caveats and future work):

ContrastCompared runsOption tested
Irrigationirrigation_on − controlirrigation on
Land coverevolving_landcover − irrigation_onevolving land cover, irrigation held on
Hillslopehillslope_eval − controlhillslope hydrology
Phenologyprog_phenology − controlprognostic (BGC) vs satellite phenology

Medians use 2,257 gauges (2,256 for KGE and correlation: the Swan River at East Patchogue, NY has zero simulated flow, so KGE is undefined there).

Summary across gauges

ConfigurationMedian NSEMedian NSE, ≥ 60 months (n = 2,128)Median KGEMedian PBIASMedian abs(PBIAS)Median correlation
control0.1060.1090.251+13.2%28.1%0.642
irrigation_on0.1060.1090.249+15.0%28.2%0.643
evolving_landcover0.0970.0990.253+13.7%28.1%0.639
hillslope_eval0.2190.2220.348−17.5%32.2%0.712
prog_phenology0.0670.0760.215+30.7%40.5%0.680

Gauges improved vs baseline (better / worse; the rest unchanged)

ContrastNSE, strictNSE, materialKGE, strictKGE, materialabs(PBIAS), strictabs(PBIAS), material
Irrigation vs control942 / 1,312222 / 5741,056 / 1,200188 / 4411,024 / 1,230272 / 527
Land cover vs irrigation_on1,238 / 1,016547 / 4141,257 / 999379 / 3001,107 / 1,147445 / 394
Hillslope vs control1,352 / 9021,309 / 8591,412 / 8441,365 / 7761,068 / 1,1861,049 / 1,156
Prog. phenology vs control924 / 1,330835 / 1,235858 / 1,398756 / 1,310665 / 1,589601 / 1,513

Irrigation. Irrigation leaves the median NSE at 0.106 and raises the median PBIAS from +13.2% to +15.0%. 796 of 2,257 gauges change materially, and losses outnumber gains (222 better, 574 worse in NSE). The losses concentrate in the Missouri (28 / 135), the Pacific Northwest (27 / 147), Texas-Gulf (6 / 55) and California (10 / 49); the Missouri median PBIAS rises from +86% to +96%.

Change in monthly NSE, irrigation_on − control

Change in monthly NSE at each gauge, irrigation_on − control. Blue is better; colours are clipped at ±0.3.

Land cover. Against irrigation_on, evolving land cover lowers the median NSE from 0.106 to 0.097 even though more gauges improve than degrade (547 better, 414 worse in NSE). Gains are in the Pacific Northwest (169 / 19), California (50 / 15) and the Great Basin (26 / 9). Losses are in the Missouri (80 / 93), the Mid-Atlantic (33 / 54), South Atlantic-Gulf (25 / 38) and Souris-Red-Rainy, where the median NSE falls from 0.208 to −0.041.

Change in monthly NSE, evolving_landcover − irrigation_on

Change in monthly NSE at each gauge, evolving_landcover − irrigation_on. Blue is better; colours are clipped at ±0.3.

Hillslope hydrology. Hillslope roughly doubles the median NSE (0.106 to 0.219) and raises median KGE from 0.251 to 0.348 and median correlation from 0.642 to 0.712. NSE is materially better at 1,309 gauges and worse at 859.

Change in monthly NSE, hillslope_eval − control

Change in monthly NSE at each gauge, hillslope_eval − control. Blue is better; colours are clipped at ±0.3.

Prognostic phenology. prog_phenology lowers skill on all three metrics: median NSE falls to 0.067, KGE to 0.215, and median PBIAS rises to +30.7%. NSE is materially worse at 1,235 gauges and better at 835; abs(PBIAS) is worse at 1,513. Median correlation rises from 0.642 to 0.680.

Change in monthly NSE, prog_phenology − control

Change in monthly NSE at each gauge, prog_phenology − control. Blue is better; colours are clipped at ±0.3.

By region (HUC02). Median monthly NSE, KGE and PBIAS per configuration, and gauges materially better / worse in NSE per contrast.

Median monthly NSE, KGE and PBIAS by HUC02 region and configuration

Median monthly NSE, KGE and PBIAS by HUC02 region and configuration. Cell text is the median; colours are clipped at ±1 (NSE, KGE) and ±100% (PBIAS). For PBIAS the colour shows over- (+) or under-prediction (−), not skill.

The six bar charts below show the share of each region’s gauges better (blue, right) or worse (red, left) than the contrast’s baseline; for abs(PBIAS), smaller counts as better. Material counts a change larger than 0.01 in NSE or KGE, or 1 pp in abs(PBIAS); strict counts any change. Numbers at the bar ends are gauge counts.

Gauges materially better / worse in NSE by HUC02 region

NSE, material.

Gauges better / worse in KGE, material, by HUC02 region

KGE, material.

Gauges better / worse in abs(PBIAS), material, by HUC02 region

abs(PBIAS), material.

Gauges better / worse in NSE, strict, by HUC02 region

NSE, strict.

Gauges better / worse in KGE, strict, by HUC02 region

KGE, strict.

Gauges better / worse in abs(PBIAS), strict, by HUC02 region

abs(PBIAS), strict.

Every regional median and count (NSE, KGE and PBIAS; strict and material) is in huc02_summary.csv, attached here (huc02_summary.csv) and on GLADE at /glade/work/mozhgana/ctsm_conus_output/report/huc02_summary.csv.